Jump to content

Talk:China–South Korea football rivalry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A-match

[edit]

Korea vs China ( 2/10/2010) wasn't A-match game. Even though China won 3-0. It should not count as part 32 years history. If Korean National Team ( A Team) played China. China would not reach that goal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanRedDevil (talkcontribs) 03:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a official (2/10/2010: Korea-China 3-0 game). Money Bribe game Chinese government gave 370 million dollars to Korean Football Association. In return Chinese government won't televised the game on public CCTV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanDevilSoccer (talkcontribs) 13:00, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

China national team beats S.Korea for the first time, netizen reactions

[edit]

Regards, -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 10:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

I've renamed the article. There's no reliable source to back up the English translation as "Koreaphobia". That sounds like a translation the original editor came up with. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 14:36, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Konghanzheng. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]